Volume 3 · Number 1 · Pages 27–29
A Constructivist Speculation about Parmenides

Ernst von Glasersfeld

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Purpose: An attempt to interpret the fragments of Parmenides as a first suggestion of a constructivist epistemology. Today, two and a half millennia later, no one can be sure of what exactly Parmenides had in mind. Method: Reviewing the varying translations of acknowledged experts and paying attention to what Plato said in his Parmenides dialog. Findings: We cannot be certain of any interpretation, but an epistemologically unbiased review of the translations shows that Parmenides may well have believed that experience is the domain accessible to human reason and the structure of the real world lies beyond it. Implications: Forerunners of constructivist ideas may have been overlooked because the interpreters of ancient texts were stuck in dogmatic views of “being.” When studying classical texts written in languages that are no longer spoken, it is fruitful to consult many different translations.

Key words: epistemology, existence, experience, interpretation, translation


Glasersfeld E. von (2007) A constructivist speculation about parmenides. Constructivist Foundations 3(1): 27–29. http://constructivist.info/3/1/027

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Ollagnier-Beldame M. & Coupé C. (2019) Meeting You for the First Time: Descriptive Categories of an Intersubjective Experience
Bitbol M. & Petitmengin C. (2013) A Defense of Introspection from Within
Kravchenko A. V. (2020) A Critique of Barbieri’s Code Biology
Glasersfeld E. von (2005) Thirty Years Constructivism
Glasersfeld E. von (2010) Why People Dislike Radical Constructivism


Cordero N.-L. (2004) By being, it is: The thesis of Parmenides. Parmenides Publishing, Las Vegas. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cornford F. M. (1939) Plato and Parmenides. Bobbs-Merrill: Indianapolis. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
de Santillana G. (1968) Reflections on men and ideas. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Diels H. (1957) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (8th edition). Rowohlt: Hamburg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kirk G. S. & Raven J. E. (1960) The Presocratic philosophers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Phillips E. D. (1955) Parmenides on thought and being, Philosophical Review 64: 547–559. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Plato (undated) Theaetetus. Translated by F. M. Cornford. Bobbs-Merrill: Indianapois, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Russell B. (1917) Mysticism and logic. Unwin Paperbacks, London. Reprinted in 1953 by Penguin Books, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schrödinger E. (1956) Die Natur und die Griechen. Hamburg: Rowohlt. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stenzel J. (1925) Zur Entwicklung des Geistbegriffs in der griechischen Philosophie. Die Antike 1: 249–250. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Untersteiner M. (1958) Parmenide, testimonianze e frammenti. La Nuova Italia Editrice: Florence. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wheelright P. (1966) The Presocratics. Bobbs-Merrill: Indianapolis, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.