Volume 3 · Number 3 · Pages 148–152
Action and Discourse. Some Thoughts Concerning a Non-dualizing Conception of Experience

Franz Ofner

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Purpose: The paper aims at examining whether George Herbert Mead’s theory of language is an appropriate candidate for developing a non-dualistic conception of experience and empirical research. Problem: Josef Mitterer has limited his theory of a non-dualizing way of speaking to criticizing dualistic positions in philosophy and sciences but has not developed a non-dualistic conception of empirical research. To do this, the task is to forego the notion “description” as a remainder category of dualism to develop a new understanding of language. Findings: Mead’s communication and action theory contains a non-dualistic nucleus. His gesture theory of communication allows us to distinguish action and speech and connect them in a non-dualizing way. Further research should especially focus on the relation between immediate and reflective experience in Mead’s work.

Key words: non-dualism, communication theory, experience theory


Ofner F. (2008) Action and discourse. Some thoughts concerning a non-dualizing conception of experience. Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 148–152. http://constructivist.info/3/3/148

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Ofner F. (2013) Some Ideas towards a Non-dualism-Compatible Theory of Science
Vörös S. (2014) The Uroboros of Consciousness: Between the Naturalisation of Phenomenology and the Phenomenologisation of Nature
Weiss M. G. (2013) Non-dualistic Sex. Josef Mitterer’s Non-dualistic Philosophy in the Light of Judith Butler’s (De)Constructivist Feminism
Riegler A. & Weber S. (2013) Non-dualism: A New Understanding of Language
Ene P. (2013) Descriptions as Distinctions. George Spencer Brown’s Calculus of Indications as a Basis for Mitterer’s Non-dualistic Descriptions


Baldwin J. D. (1986) George Herbert Mead. A unifying theory for sociology. Sage: Newbury Park. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dewey J. (1896) The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review 3: 357–370. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mead G. H. (1900) Suggestions toward a theory of the philosophical disciplines. Philosophical Review 9: 1–17. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mead G. H. (1903) The definition of the psychical. In: Decennial Publications of the University of Chicago, First Series, Volume III. University of Chicago, Chicago: 77–112. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mead G. H. (1910) What social objects must psychology presuppose? Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 7: 174–180. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mead G. H. (1912) The mechanism of social consciousness. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 9: 401–406. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mead G. H. (1934) Mind self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist (Edited by Charles W. Morris). University of Chicago, Chicago. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mead G. H. (1938) The philosophy of the act (Edited by Charles W. Morris with John M. Brewster, Albert M. Dunham and David Miller). University of Chicago, Chicago. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (1992) Das Jenseits der Philosophie. Wider das dualistische Erkenntnisprinzip. Edition Passagen, Vienna. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.