Non-dualistic? Radical Constructivist?
Karl H. Müller
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Purpose: Josef Mitterer’s essays are considered to be important philosophical advancements of radical constructivism. The main purposes of this paper are, on the one hand, to structure the RC landscape and, on the other hand, to investigate the relations of Mitterer’s work to radical constructivism in particular and to philosophy in general. Findings: In this short essay focusing on Mitterer’s Das Jenseits der Philosophie, I would like to stress two major points. First, Mitterer’s book should be considered as one of several contemporary variants of a radical critique of the semantic turn in the philosophy of science that has taken place since the mid-thirties with the works of Rudolf Carnap, Carl G. Hempel, Hilary Putnam, Alfred Tarski and others. Second, it is by no means clear how to determine the relevance of the new semantic critique for the present and future cognitive status of radical constructivism. The degree of relevance depends crucially on the use of the term “radical constructivism.” If radical constructivism, as I will argue, is seen as an umbrella term for a group of empirical research programs, then, by sheer necessity, the relevance can be marginal only. If, however, radical constructivism is viewed as a special form of philosophy of language and/or as a new epistemology, then the importance of Josef Mitterer’s approach must be judged within the context of available functional alternatives. Implications: An immediate consequence of this article lies in a renewed emphasis on advancing an empirical research agenda for radical constructivism and in an effective downsizing of radical constructivism as a philosophical perspective.
Key words: cognitive maps, research programs, varieties of constructivism, varieties of dualism/non-dualism
Citation
Müller K. H. (2008) Non-dualistic? Radical constructivist? Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 181–191. http://constructivist.info/3/3/181
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Balzer W., Moulines C. U. & Sneed J. D. (1987) An architectonic for science. The structuralist program. Reidel, Dordrecht.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beer S. (1994) Decision and control. The meaning of operational research and management cybernetics. John Wiley, Chichester.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beer S. (1994) How many grapes went into the wine. Stafford Beer on the art and science of holistic management. Edited by Roger Harnden and Alenna Leonard. John Wiley, Chichester.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brandom R. B. (1994) Making it explicit. Reasoning, representing and discursive commitment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brandom R. B. (2000) Expressive Vernunft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. Originally publication: Brandom R. B. (1994) Making it explicit. Reasoning, representing, and. discursive commitment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brandom R. B. (2004) Begründen und Begreifen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brandom R. B. (2008) Between saying and doing. Towards an analytic pragmatism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brandom R. B. (2008) The John Locke lectures 2005–2006, Lecture 1. Retrieved from http://www.pitt.edu/~brandom/locke/downloads/LL1%20EPA%2007–510%20a.doc on 18 March 2008.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bunge M. (1977) Treatise on basic philosophy. Ontology I: The furniture of the world. Reidel, Dordrecht.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bunge M. (1979) Treatise on basic philosophy. Ontology II: A world of systems. Reidel, Dordrecht.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bunge M. (1983) Treatise on basic philosophy. Epistemology and methodology I: Exploring the world. Reidel, Dordrecht.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bunge M. (1983) Treatise on basic philosophy. Epistemology and methodology II: Understanding the world. Reidel, Dordrecht.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Donovan A., Laudan L. & Laudan R. (eds.) (1988) Scrutinizing science. Empirical studies of scientific change. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1981) Das Konstruieren einer Wirklichkeit. In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) Die erfundene Wirklichkeit. Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben? Beiträge zum Konstruktivismus. Piper, Munich: 39–60.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1988) Abbau und Aufbau. In: Simon F. B. (ed.) Lebende Systeme. Wirklichkeitskonstruktionen in der Systemischen Therapie. Springer, Berlin: 19–33.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (2001) Rückschauen und Vorschauen. Heinz von Foerster im Gespräch mit Albert Müller und Karl H. Müller. In: Müller A., Müller K. H. & Stadler F. (eds.) Konstruktivismus und Kognitionswissenschaft. Kulturelle Wurzeln und Ergebnisse. Heinz von Foerster gewidmet. Second enlarged edition. Springer, Vienna: 229–242.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1997) Wie ich zum Konstruktivisten heranwuchs. Sprachen und geistreiche Menschen. In: Glasersfeld E. von, Radikaler Konstruktivismus. Ideen, Ergebnisse, Probleme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 22–55.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Holenstein E. (2004) Philosophie-Atlas. Orte und Wege des Denkens. Ammann, Zurich.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hollingsworth J. R. & Hollingsworth E. J. (2000) Radikale Innovationen und Forschungsorganisation. Eine Annäherung. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften 1: 31–66.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ludwig G. (1990) Die Grundstrukturen einer physikalischen Theorie. Second Edition. Springer, Berlin.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lyotard J. F. (1984) The postmodern condition. A report on knowledge. Manchester University Press, Manchester.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Müller K. H. (2007) The BCL. An unfinished revolution of an unfinished revolution. In: Müller A. & Müller K. H. (eds.) An unfinished revolution? Heinz von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratoty | BCL, 1958–1976. Edition echoraum, Vienna: 407–466.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Müller K. H. (2007) What is radical about radical constructivism? In: Glanville R. & Riegler A. (eds.) The importance of being Ernst. Festschrift for Ernst von Glasersfeld. Edition echoraum, Vienna: 239–261.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rescher N. (1994) Philosophical standard-ism.An empiricist approach to philosophical methodology. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (1987) Der Radikale Konstruktivismus: Ein neues Paradigma im interdisziplinären Diskurs. In: Schmidt S. J. (ed.) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 11–88.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (2003) Geschichten & Diskurse. Abschied vom Konstruktivismus. Rowohlt, Reinbek. English translation: Schmidt S. J. (2007) Histories & discourses: Rewriting constructivism. Imprint Academic, Exeter.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sellars W. (2002) Der Empirismus und die Philosophie des Geistes. Second edition. Mentis, Paderborn.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sellars W. (2007) In the space of reasons. Selected essays of Wilfrid Sellars. Edited by K. Scharp and R. B. Brandom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sneed J. D. (1979) The logical structure of mathematical physics. Second enlarged edition. Dordrecht, Reidel.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Soames S. (2003) Philosophical analysis in the twentieth century. Volume 2: The age of meaning. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Soames S. (2007) Reference and description. The case against two dimensionality. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Watzlawick P. (1981) Die erfundene Wirklichkeit. Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben? Beiträge zum Konstruktivismus. Piper, Munich.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.