Conversation: Possibilities of its Repair and Descent into Discourse and Computation
Klaus Krippendorff
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: This essay contends that radical constructivism makes a mistake in focusing on cognition at the expense of where cognitive phenomena surface: in the interactive use of language. Goal: It grounds radically social constructivism by exploring the conversational nature of being human. It also urges abandoning the celebration of observation, inherited from the enlightenment’s preoccupation with description, in favor of participation, the recognition that speaking and writing are acts of continuously reconstructing reality, which is only partly conceivable yet is interacted with. Method: It distinguishes between conversation as observed and conversation as articulated by its participants. It postulates accountability as a chief conversational move through which conversations can regain their natural flow when disturbed and construct inherently ethical realities for their participants. Unwillingness to repair problematic conversations amounts to acquiescence to constraints that are typical of discourses and the construction of institutional realities. Implications: It suggests that the ultimate institutionalization consists of replacing institutional artifacts with computational ones, which was the aim of early cybernetics. Computational artifacts have no agency and cannot be held accountable for what they do. This essay proposes a continuum of possible discourses between authentic conversation and computation. It concludes by calling for the drawing of finer distinctions within that continuum and expresses the hope for not closing off the possibility of returning to authentic conversation where humans realize their being human – rather than institutional actors or machines.
Key words: language, institutions, conversation, computation, participation, cybernetics
Citation
Krippendorff K. (2009) Conversation: Possibilities of its repair and descent into discourse and computation. Constructivist Foundations 4(3): 138–150. http://constructivist.info/4/3/138
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Austin J. L. (1962) How to do things with words. Edited by J. O. Urmson. Oxford University Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bartesaghi M. (2009) How the therapist does authority: Six strategies for substituting client accounts in the session. Communication & Medicine 6(1): 15–26.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Berger P. L. & Luckmann T. (1966) The social construction of reality: A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday, Garden City NY.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Billig M. (2009) A psychoanalytic discursive psychology: From consciousness to unconsciousness. Discourse Studies 8(1): 17–24.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brown P. & Levinson S. (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Goffman E. (1976) Replies and responses. Language and Society 5: 257–313.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Goodwin C. (1981) Conversational organization. Interactions between speakers and hearers. Academic Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Grice H. P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P. & Morgan J. L. (eds.) Syntax and semantics. Volume 3, Speech Acts. Academic Press, New York: 41–58.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Grice H. P. (1978) Further notes on logic and conversation. In: Cole P. (ed.) Syntax and semantics. Volume 9, Pragmatics. Academic Press, New York, 113–128.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Habermas J. (2001) Universal pragmatics: Reflections on a theory of communicative competence. In: On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction (Translated by B. Fultner). MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 67–84.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Krippendorff K. (2005) The social construction of public opinion. In: Wienand E., Westerbarkey J. & Scholl A. (eds.) Kommunikation über Kommunikation. Theorie, Methoden und Praxis. VS-Verlag, Wiesbaden: 129–149. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/ 75/ on 15 June 2009.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lakoff R. T. (1990) Talking power. The politics of language in our lives. Basic Books, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Latour B. (2005) Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1988) Ontology of observing. In: Texts in Cybernetics. American Society for Cybernetics Conference Workbook, Felton CA. Retrieved from http:// www.inteco.cl/biology/ontology/ on 15 June 2009.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mills C. W. (1940) Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review 5: 904–913.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nofsinger R. E. (1999) Everyday conversation. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights IL.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary (1991) The compact and second edition. Oxford University Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Reeves B. & Nass C. (1996) The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ricoeur P. (1970) Freud and philosophy. An essay on interpretation (Translated by Denis Savage). Yale University Press, New Haven CT.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Saussure F. de (1916) Cours de Linguistique Générale. English translation (1959) Course in general linguistics (Translated by Wade Baskin). Philosophical Library, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Scott M. B. & Lyman S. M. (1968) Accounts. American Sociological Review 33: 46–62.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Volosinov V. N. (1986) Marxism and the philosophy of language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wittgenstein L. (1953) Philosophical investigations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.