Volume 5 · Number 3 · Pages 121–129
Self-Organisation and Learning Culture

Siegfried J. Schmidt

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Problem: Many disciplines talk about “learning“, but since each of them relates this term to another domain of reference, each one selects, by this term, other phenomena that are then called “learning.” Method: This article does not strive for a substantial definition of “learning” nor does it compete with psychological and pedagogical theories of learning, which are therefore not discussed. Instead I will analyse how we talk about learning and whether or not we might perhaps improve the plausibility of this discourse by applying a crucial constructivist concept, namely self-organisation. The main idea of this article reads as follows: “Learning” serves as an explanatory model for the observation of a specific type of change that happens in terms of contingent self-alterations of self-organising systems. The changing system and the observer of this system are inseparably related to one another since there “is” no change without an observation. Thus, talking about learning means talking about the observer and his culture of observation, description and evaluation at the same time. Benefits: The results of my analysis of the learning discourse are neither meant to serve as how-to knowledge for ameliorating learning processes nor do I regard them as an elaborated or new theory of learning as some ideas developed in this paper have a long tradition. Instead they can contribute to a more complex observation of these processes, aiming at a second order observation of the complicated, since complementary, interrelations between the individual, the socio-cultural, the institutional, and the situational components of the domain called “learning.” In other words, I try to demonstrate the plausibility of observing learning from the perspective of self-organisation.

Key words: change processes, contingency, culture, knowledge, second order observation, self-organisation


Schmidt S. J. (2010) Self-organisation and learning culture. Constructivist Foundations 5(3): 121–129. http://constructivist.info/5/3/121

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Palmaru R. (2012) Making Sense and Meaning: On the Role of Communication and Culture in the Reproduction of Social Systems
Schmidt S. J. (2008) So Far – From Now On. Josef Mitterer’s Non-dualistic Critique of Radical Constructivism and Some Consequences
Schmidt S. J. (2011) From Objects to Processes: A Proposal to Rewrite Radical Constructivism
Baron P. (2016) A Cybernetic Approach to Contextual Teaching and Learning
Mutelesi E. (2006) Radical Constructivism Seen with Edmund Husserl as Starting Point


Baecker D. (1998) Zum Problem des Wissens in Organisationen. In: Organisationsent-wicklung 3: 5–21. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Balgo R. & Lindemann H. (eds.) (2006) Theorie und Praxis systemischer Pädagogik. Carl-Auer, Heidelberg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Collins A. & R. Halverson (2009) Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Damasio A. (1994) Descartes’ error. Putnam, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Davidson C. N., Goldberg D. T. & Jones Z. M. (2009) The future of learning institutions in a digital age. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fosnot C. T. (ed.) (2005) Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice. Teachers College Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. The Falmer Press, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hug T. (2007) Didactics of microlearning – Introductury note. In: Hug T. (ed.) (2007) Didactics of microlearning. Concepts, discourses and examples. Waxmann, Münster: 10–14. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hug T. (ed.) (2007) Didactics of microlearning. Concepts, discourses and examples. Waxmann, Münster. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hug T. (ed.) (2008) Media, knowledge & education. Exploring new spaces, relations and dynamics in digital media ecologies. Innsbruck University Press, Innsbruck. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jenkins H., Purushotma R., Clinton K., Weigel M. & Robison A. J. (2007) Confronting the challenges of participatory culture. Media education in the 21st century. MacArthur Foundation, Chicago. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jünger S. (2004) Selbstorganisation, Lernkultur und Kompetenzentwicklung. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kafai Y. & Resnick M. (eds.) (1996) Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Routledge, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lindemann H. (2006) Konstruktivismus und Pädagogik. Grundlagen, Modelle, Wege zur Praxis. Ernst Reinhardt, München. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Meyen M. & Pfaff-Rüdiger S. (2009) Web 2.0 im Alltag, Weltwissen, Identitätsmanagement und Kommunikation. Eine qualitative Studie zum kulturellen Wandel. In: Pscheida D. & Trüllzsch S. (2009) Das Web 2.0 als Agent des kulturellen Wandels. Peter Lang, Frankfurt/M.: 193–210. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nünning A. (ed.) (2008) Metzler Lexikon Literatur- und Kulturtheorie. 4th edition, Metzler, Stuttgart. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Papert S, (1980) Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Polanyi M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Routledge, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pscheida D. & Trüllzsch S. (eds.) (2009) Das Web 2.0 als Agent des kulturellen Wandels. Peter Lang, Frankfurt/M. (= Special Issue SPIEL 26(2)). ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Reich K. (2005) Systemisch-konstruktivistische Pädagogik: Einführung in die Grundlagen einer interaktionistisch-konstruktivistischen Pädagogik. 5th edition. Beltz, Weinheim. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sawyer R. K. (ed.) (2005) The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schlosser G. (1993) Einheit der Welt und Einheitswissenschaft. Grundlegung einer Allgemeinen Systemtheorie. Vieweg, Wiesbaden. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (2003) Kognitive Autonomie und soziale Orientierung. 3rd edition. LIT Verlag, Münster. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (2004) Unternehmenskultur. Die Grundlage für den wirtschaftlichen Erfolg von Unternehmen. Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (2005) Lernen, Wissen, Kompetenz, Kultur. Vorschläge zur Bestimmung von vier Unbekannten. Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag, Heidelberg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (2007) Histories and discourses. Rewriting constructivism. Imprint Academic, Exeter Originally published in German as: Schmidt S. J. (2003) Geschichten & Diskurse. Abschied vom Konstruktivismus. Rowohlt, Reinbek. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (2010) Die Endgültigkeit der Vorläufigkeit. Prozessualität als Argumentationsstrategie. Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (ed.) (2001) Lernen im Zeitalter des Internets. Pädagogisches Institut, Bozen. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Siebert H. (2001) Selbstgesteuertes Lernen und Lernberatung. Luchterhand, Neuwied. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Siebert H. (2003) Vernetztes Lernen. Systemisch-konstruktivistische Methoden der Bildungsarbeit. Luchterhand, Neuwied. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Siebert H. (2007) Konstruktivistisch lehren und lernen. Ziel, Augsburg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Simon F. B. (1995) Die Kunst, nicht zu lernen. In: Fischer H. R. (ed.) Die Wirklichkeit des Konstruktivismus. Carl-Auer, Heidelberg: 353–365. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Spender J.-C. (1993) Competitive advantage from tacit knowledge? Unpacking the concept and its strategic implications. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 37–41. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Spender J.-C. (1998) Pluralist epistemology and the knowledge-based theory of the firm. Organization 5(2): 37–41. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Voß R. (ed.) (2005) Unterricht aus konstruktivistischer Sicht: Die Welten in den Köpfen der Kinder. Beltz, Weinheim. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.