Riegler A. & Quale A. (2010) Editorial: Can Radical Constructivism Become a Mainstream Endeavor?. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 1–5

Volume 6 · Number 1 · Pages 1–5

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Editorial: Can Radical Constructivism Become a Mainstream Endeavor?

Alexander Riegler & Andreas Quale

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: Despite many obvious advantages (radical) constructivism has over other philosophies it has failed to become a mainstream philosophy that is widely taught and discussed. Problem: What are the reasons for this failure? Can we identify issues that make it difficult for scholars to accept and even embrace radical constructivist ideas? What is the best way to characterize, explain, and eventually refute objections? Method: By collecting articles from both proponents and opponents of radical constructivism the editors of the special issue tried to present a range of answers to these questions. Results: Some problems are due to known objections to radical constructivism, in particular the idea that being responsible for one’s own constructions opens doors to a “whatever” attitude. Another important insight is that constructivism seems to resemble a river delta with ever branching new sub-disciplines that become increasingly incompatible with each other. Implications: The insights gained from the contributions may lead to a re-orientation of (radical) constructivism that will include less misunderstandings among its critics and to a higher acceptance in the academic community.

Key words: scientific movements, philosophy of science, society, anything goes, science management strategies

Citation

Riegler A. & Quale A. (2010) Editorial: Can radical constructivism become a mainstream endeavor? Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 1–5. http://constructivist.info/6/1/001

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Müller K. H. & Riegler A. (2014) Second-Order Science: A Vast and Largely Unexplored Science Frontier

Umpleby S. A. (2014) Second-Order Science: Logic, Strategies, Methods

Müller K. H. (2011) The Two Epistemologies of Ernst von Glasersfeld

Peschl M. F. (2007) Triple-Loop Learning as Foundation for Profound Change, Individual Cultivation, and Radical Innovation: Construction Processes beyond Scientific and Rational Knowledge

Vörös S. & Riegler A. (2017) A Plea for not Watering Down the Unseemly: Reconsidering Francisco Varela’s Contribution to Science

References

Cariani P. (2010) Onwards and upwards, radical constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 127–132. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/6/1/127.cariani

Foerster H. von (1973) On constructing a reality. In: Preiser F. E. (ed.) Environmental design research, Vol. 2. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross: Stroudberg: 35–46. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding. Springer: New York: 211–228. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Foerster H. von (1992) Ethics and second-order cybernetics. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 1: 9–19. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology. In: Smock C. D. & Glasersfeld E. von (eds.) Epistemology and education. Follow Through Publications, Athens GA: 1–24. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/034

Glasersfeld E. von (1981) Declaration of the American Society for Cybernetics. ASC Newsletter. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/065

Glasersfeld E. von (1989) Constructivism in education. In: Husen T. & Postlethwaite T. N. (eds.) The international encyclopaedia of education, supplementary volume 1. Pergamon Press, Oxford: 162–163. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/114

Glasersfeld E. von (2007) Aspects of constructivism. Vico, Berkeley, Piaget. In: Glasersfeld E. von, Key works in radical constructivism. Sense, Rotterdam: 91–99. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Howe K. & Berv J. (2000) Constructing constructivism, epistemological and pedagogical. In: Phillips D. C. (ed.) Constructivism in education. Part 1. National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago IL: 19–40. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

McCarty L. P. & Schwandt T. A. (2000) Seductive illusions. In: Phillips D. C. (ed.) Constructivism in education. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 41–85. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Mitterer J. (1994) Das Jenseits der Philosophie. Vienna: Edition Passagen. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Müller A. & Müller K. H. (eds.) (2007) An unfinished revolution. Heinz von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratory (BCL), 1958–1976. Edition echoraum, Vienna. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Nola R. (1997) Constructivism in science and science education. Science & Education 6(1–2): 55–83. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Riegler A. (2001) Toward a radical constructivist understanding of science. Foundations of Science 6: 1–30. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Riegler A. (2005) Editorial. The constructivist challenge. Constructivist Foundations 1(1): 1–8. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/1/001.riegler

Riegler A. (2005) Inclusive worldviews. In: Aerts D., D’Hooghe B. & Note N. (eds.) Worldviews, science and us. World Scientific, Singapore: 20–37. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Schmidt S. J. (ed.) (1987) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Stewart J. (1996) Cognition = life: Implications for higher-level cognition. Behavioural Processes 35: 311–326. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.