You are not logged in Log in


> About the Journal
> Board
> Policies
> Guidelines for Authors
> Acknowledgment to Reviewers
> Constructivist Community: Authors
> Constructivist E-Paper Archive (CEPA)
> Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

LATEST ISSUES

Volume 18
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 17
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 16
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 15
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 14
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 13
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 12
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 11
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 10
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 9
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 8
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 7
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 6
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 5
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 4
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 3
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 2
Numbers 2–3
Number 1
Volume 1
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1

FOLLOW US

Twitter · LinkedIn · RSS Feed
Login to provide us with feedback
Issues ┆ Submit ┆ FAQ ┆ Index
Volume 6 · Number 1 · Pages 100–101
< Previous Paper · Next Paper >
Realities in Radical Constructivism. Commentary on Johnson’s “Footprints in the Sand”

Hugh Gash

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Share on

Abstract

Context: Johnson argues that because radical constructivism requires social constraints and therefore ontological assumptions, it is no different from constructive realism, which is comparatively mainstream. Results: While the distinction between these approaches appears slim, our concepts are not independent of us, and may need to change in spite of established traditions. Implications: Perhaps radical constructivism cannot be mainstream because it is essentially concerned with epistemological origins of concepts and consequently is not practical enough for the received consensus.

Key words: epiphany, reality, social, testimony

Citation

Gash H. (2010) Realities in radical constructivism. Commentary on johnson’s “footprints in the sand”. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 100–101. http://constructivist.info/6/1/100

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Gash H. (2011) Maturana’s Theory and Interpersonal Ethics
Gash H. (2020) Constructivism, Fast Thinking, Heuristics and Sustainable Development
Umpleby S. A. (2016) Second-Order Cybernetics as a Fundamental Revolution in Science
Vörös S. & Riegler A. (2017) A Plea for not Watering Down the Unseemly: Reconsidering Francisco Varela’s Contribution to Science
Scholl A. (2012) Author’s Response: What Constructivism Does not Say

References

Foerster H. von (1991) Through the eyes of the other. In: Steier F. (ed.) Research and reflexivity. Sage, London: 63–75. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Harris P. L. & Koenig M. (2006) Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development 77(3): 505–524. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Johnson D. K. (2010) Footprints in the sand: Radical constructivism and the mystery of the other. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 90–99. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/6/1/090.johnson
Maturana H. R. (1988) Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. Special issue on “Radical constructivism, autopoiesis and psychotherapy” edited by Vincent Kenny. Irish Journal of Psychology 9: 25–82. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.