Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite
Peter Slezak
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: The current situation in philosophy of science includes central, ongoing debates about realism and anti-realism. The same question has been central to the theorising of radical constructivism and, in particular, to its implications for educational theory. However the constructivist literature does not make significant contact with the most important, mainstream philosophical discussions. Problem: Despite its overwhelming influence among educationalists, I suggest that the “radical constructivism” of Ernst Glasersfeld is an example of fashionable but thoroughly problematic doctrines that can have little benefit for practical pedagogy or teacher education. My critique has a positive goal: it is important to understand why constructivism has generated such severe polarization and disputation. A symptom of the problem is the concern with the most abstruse and obdurate problems of philosophy that have no conceivable bearing on educational practice or anything else, for that matter. The diagnosis is confirmed by those pedagogical recommendations that are allegedly derived from radical constructivism that are touted as revolutionary but are platitudes of common sense. I suggest that, ironically, this observation itself provides some pedagogical insight. Method: The approach adopted for the topic is critical, philosophical analysis of the various claims and theses of radical constructivism in the light of philosophy of science and psychology. Results: The findings of the paper are that central theoretical claims of constructivism are couched in an unclear and unnecessary jargon that obscures the implausibility or banality of these claims. Implications: The value of the paper lies in providing an analysis and critique of central, influential claims of radical constructivism both in relation to issues in epistemology and also in relation to the alleged bearing of these claims on pedagogy. It is suggested that, contrary to the claims of radical constructivists, there are few if any implications for practice and applications.
Key words: learning, teaching, metaphysics, epistemology, realism, fallibilism
Citation
Slezak P. (2010) Radical constructivism: Epistemology, education and dynamite. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 102–111. http://constructivist.info/6/1/102
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Austin J. L. (1962) Sense and sensibilia. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barnes B., Bloor D. & Henry J. (1996) Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cardellini L. (2006) The foundations of radical constructivism: An interview with Ernst von Glasersfeld. Foundations of Chemistry 8: 177–187.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cobb P. (1994) Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher 23(7): 13–20.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ernest P. (1995) Preface by series editor. In: Glasersfeld E. von, Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London: xi–xii.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gale J. E. (1995) Preface. In: Steffe L. P. & Gale J. (eds.) Constructivism in education. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale NJ: xi–xvii.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gergen K. J. (1995) Social construction and educational process. In: Steffe L. P. & Gale J. (eds.) Constructivism in education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 17–40.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) A constructivist approach to teaching. In: Steffe L. P. & Gale J. (eds.) Constructivism in education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 3–16.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kitcher P. (2001) Real realism: The Galilean strategy. The Philosophical Review 110(2): 151–197.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Laudan L. (1990) Science & relativism. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Matthews M. R. (2000) Appraising constructivism in science and mathematical education. In: Phillips D. C. (ed.) Constructivism in education: Ninety-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 161–192.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McDowell J. (1994) Mind and world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mills C. W. (1959) The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Munzel F. (2003) Kant on moral education, or “englightenment” and the liberal arts. The Review of Metaphysics 57(1): 43–73.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nola R. (1998) Constructivism in science and science education: A philosophical critique. In: Matthews M. R. (ed.) Constructivism in science education. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 31–60.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Orwell G. (1984) Politics and the English language. In: The Penguin essays of George Orwell. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth: 348–360. Originally published in 1946.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Phillips D. C. (1997) How, why, what, when, and where: Perspectives on constructivism in psychology and education. Issues in Education 3(2): 151–194.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Phillips D. C. (ed.) (2000) Constructivism in education: Ninety-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Putnam H. (1994) Sense, nonsense, and the senses: An inquiry into the powers of the human mind. The Dewey Lectures at Columbia University 1994. The Journal of Philosophy 91(9): 445–517.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Quine W. V. (1961) Identity, ostension, and hypostasis. In: Quine W. V., From a logical point of view. Second Edition. Harper, New York: 65–79.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Quine W. V. (1961) Two dogmas of empiricism. In: Quine W. V., From a logical point of view. Second Edition. Harper, New York: 20–46. Originally published in 1951.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ruhloff J. (2001) The problematic employment of Reason in philosophy of Bildung and education. In: Heyting F., Lenzen D. & Ponsford White J. (eds.) Methods in philosophy of education. Routledge, London: 57–72.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schlick M. (1980) Facts and propositions. In: Schlick M., Philosophical papers: Volume II (1925–1936) Edited by Henk L. Mulder & Barbara F. B. van de Velde-Schlick. Springer, New York: 400–405. Originally published as: Schlick M. (1935) Facts and propositions. Analysis 2(5): 65–70.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Shotter J. (1995) In dialogue: Social constructionism and radical constructivism. In: Steffe L. P. & Gale J. (eds.) Constructivism in education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 41–56.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Slezak P. (1994) Laboratory life under the microscope: The sociology of science & science education. Part 2. Science & Education 3(4): 329–355.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Slezak P. (1997) Review of Barnes, Bloor & Henry: Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. Metascience – New Series 11: 44–52.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Slezak P. (2000) Radical social constructivism. In: Philips D. C. (ed.) National Society for the Study of Education (NSSE) Yearbook. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 283–307.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sokal A. & Bricmont J. (1998) Intellectual impostures. Profile Books, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tobin K. & Tippins D. (1993) Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In: Tobin K. (ed.) The Practice of constructivism in science education. Lawrence-Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 3–21.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
van Fraassen B. (1980) The scientific image. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.
