Volume 6 · Number 2 · Pages 213–219
The Semantics of the Fundamental Elements of Language in Ernst von Glasersfeld’s Work

Giulio Benedetti

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: The constructivist approach to the definition (or analysis) of the fundamental meanings of language in Ernst von Glasersfeld’s work. Problem: Has this approach achieved better results than other approaches? Method: Review of a book chapter by von Glasersfeld that is devoted to the analysis of the concepts of “unity,” “plurality” and “number.” Results: The constructivist approach to the semantics of the fundamental elements of language (some of which are fundamental for sciences too) seems to have produced positive results; moreover these are in a field where other approaches have produced results that do not objectively seem satisfactory.

Key words: semantics, numbers, mental operations, attention, language

Citation

Benedetti G. (2011) The semantics of the fundamental elements of language in Ernst von Glasersfeld’s work. Constructivist Foundations 6(2): 213–219. http://constructivist.info/6/2/213

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Kügler P. (2013) Non-dualism versus Conceptual Relativism
Accame F. (2007) Ernst von Glasersfeld and the Italian Operative School
Weibel P. (2008) Tertium Datur. Historical Preconditions and Ways to Mitterer’s Non-dualizing Philosophy
Grampp S. (2008) Dualism Still at Work. On Wittgenstein’s Certainty
Glasersfeld E. von (2006) A Constructivist Approach to Experiential Foundations of Mathematical Concepts Revisited

References

Amietta P. L. & Magnani S. (1998) Dal gesto al pensiero. Franco Angeli, Milan. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Benedetti G. (2008) A semantics “outside language”: Operational Semantics. A new semantic theory, based on the nature and structure of thought. http://www.mind-consciousness-language.com
Benedetti G. (2009) The meaning of the basic elements of language in terms of cognitive operations: Operational Semantics. Advanced Studies in Biology 1(5–8): 255–305. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Benedetti G. (2010) A semantics of the fundamental structural elements of language, based on cognitive functions: Operational Semantics. In: Salvati G. & Rabuano V. (eds.) Cognitive psychology perspectives. Nova Science Publishers, New York: 1–61. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bennett D. C. (1975) Spatial and temporal uses of English prepositions: An essay in stratificational semantics. Longman, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Berkeley G. (1706–1708) Philosophical commentaries. (Also known as “Commonplace book.” Reprinted in: Luce A. A. & Jessop T. E. (eds.) (1950) The works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Volume I. Nelson, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bridgman P. W. (1961) The way things are. Viking-Compass, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Caramuel J. (1670) Mathesis biceps, Meditatio prooemialis [Binary arithmetic; Introductory meditation] Officina Episcopali, Campania. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ceccato S. & Zonta B. (1980) Linguaggio consapevolezza pensiero. Feltrinelli, Milan. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ceccato S. (1966) Un tecnico fra i filosofi. Two volumes. Marsilio, Padua. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ceccato S. (ed.) (1969) Corso di linguistica operativa. Longanesi, Milan. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cooper G. S. (1968) A semantic analysis of English locative prepositions. Bolt, Beranek & Newman Report 1587. Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, Springfield VA. http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=AD0666444
Di Tomaso V. (1996) Un’analisi semantica di alcune preposizioni italiane. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 25(2): 257–290. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1972) Semantic analysis of verbs in terms of conceptual situations. Linguistics 94: 90–106. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/022.
Glasersfeld E. von (1974) “Because” and the concepts of causation. Semiotica 12(2): 129–144. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/031.
Glasersfeld E. von (1981) An attentional model for the conceptual construction of units and number. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 12: 83–94. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (2006) A constructivist approach to experiential foundations of mathematical concepts revisited. Constructivist Foundations 1(2): 61–72. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/2/061.glasersfeld.
Goddard C. & Wierzbicka A. (eds.) (1994) Semantic and lexical universals. Theory and empirical findings. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Goddard C. & Wierzbicka A. (eds.) (2002) Meaning and universal grammar. Theory and empirical findings. Two volumes. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Goddard C. (1998) Bad arguments against semantic primitives. Theoretical Linguistics 24(2/3): 129–156. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Goddard C. (2001) Conceptual primes in early language development. In: Putz M., Niemeier S. & Dirven R. (eds.) Applied cognitive linguistics I: Theory and language acquisition. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin: 193–227. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Goddard C. (2002) The search for the shared semantic core of all languages. In: Goddard C. & Wierzbicka A. (eds.) Meaning and universal grammar. Theory and empirical findings. Volume 1. John Benjamins: Amsterdam: 5–40. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Herskovits A. (1981) On the spatial use of prepositions in english. Linguisticae Investigationes 2: 303–327. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Herskovits A. (1986) Language and spatial cognition. Cambridge University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Marchetti G. (1993) The mechanics of the mind. Espansione, Rome. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Marchetti G. (1997) La macchina estetica. Il percorso operativo nella costruzione dell’atteggiamento estetico. Franco Angeli, Milan. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Marchetti G. (2010) Consciousness, attention and meaning, Nova Science Publishers. Hauppauge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McLellan J. A. & Dewey J. (1908) The psychology of number. Appleton, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tyler A., Evans V. (2003) The semantics of english prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vaccarino G. (1988) Scienza e semantica costruttivista. Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria del Politecnico, Milan. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vaccarino G. (1997) Prolegomeni. Volume I. Società Stampa Sportiva, Rome. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vaccarino G. (2000) Prolegomeni. Volume II. Società Stampa Sportiva, Rome. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wierzbicka A. (1972) Semantic Primitives. Athenäum, Frankfurt/Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wierzbicka A. (1989) Semantic primitives and lexical universals. Quaderni di Semantica X(1): 103–121. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wierzbicka A. (1989) Semantic primitives: the expanding set. Quaderni di Semantica X(2): 309–332. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wierzbicka A. (1992) The search for universal semantic primitives. In: Pütz M. (ed.) Thirty years of linguistic evolution. John Benjamins, Amsterdam: 215–242. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zelinsky-Wibbelt C. (ed.) (1993) The semantics of prepositions: From mental processing to natural language processing. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.