Ernst von Glasersfeld and Psychotherapeutic Change
Jonathan D. Raskin
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: The late Ernst von Glasersfeld humbly claimed that he was not a therapist and therefore had no comment on the relevance of his radical constructivism for psychotherapy. Problem: Because the constructivist view of psychotherapeutic change is often overlooked, this paper in von Glasersfeld’s memory uses his constructivist theory to conceptualize how such change occurs. Method: By briefly outlining the radical constructivist position and examining its theoretical implications for psychotherapy, the significance of von Glasersfeld’s theorizing for understanding therapeutic change is articulated. Results: A constructivist view of psychotherapeutic change emphasizes relational factors rather than the rote steps of an empirically supported treatment approach. While client-therapist interactions never instruct clients how to change, the therapeutic relationship is the mechanism by which client systems are disrupted and compelled to reorganize in new ways. Implications: Von Glasersfeld’s constructivism implies that therapy is a structured way of generating client change. Because all clients are closed systems, therapy is different with every client. Von Glasersfeld’s theory provides a basis for conceptualizing therapy in relational, rather than empirically supported treatment, terms.
Key words: psychotherapy, empirically supported treatments, personal construct theory, radical constructivism
Citation
Raskin J. D. (2011) Ernst von Glasersfeld and psychotherapeutic change. Constructivist Foundations 6(2): 235–238. http://constructivist.info/6/2/235
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Baker T. B., McFall R. M. & Shoham V. (2009) Current status and future prospects of clinical psychology: Toward a scientifically principled approach to mental and behavioral health care. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9(2): 67–103.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Baker T. B., McFall R. M. & Shoham V. (2009) Is your therapist a little behind the times? The Washington Post, 15 November 2009. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bohart A. C. & Tallman K. (1999) How clients make therapy work: The process of active self-healing. American Psychological Association, Washington DC.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Duncan B. L., Miller S. D., Wampold B. E. & Hubble M. A. (eds.) (2010) The heart and soul of change: Delivering what works in psychotherapy. Second edition. American Psychological Association, Washington DC.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gelso C. J. & Carter J. A. (1985) The relationship in counseling and psychotherapy: Components, consequences, and theoretical antecedents. The Counseling Psychologist 2: 155–243.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (2010) A radical constructivist view of meaning and the problem of communication. In: Raskin J. D., Bridges S. K. & Neimeyer R. A. (eds.) Studies in meaning 4: Constructivist perspectives on theory, practice, and social justice. Pace University Press, New York: 3–8.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Horvath A. O. & Luborsky L. (1993) The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61: 561–573.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lambert M. J. (2011) Psychotherapy research and its achievements. In: Norcross J. C., VandenBos G. R. & Freedheim D. K. (eds.) History of psychotherapy: Continuity and change. American Psychological Association, Washington DC: 299–332.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Matthews M. R. (1993) Constructivism and science education: Some epistemological problems. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2(1): 359–370.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nola R. (2003) “Naked before reality; skinless before the absolute”: A critique of the inaccessibility of reality argument in constructivism. Science & Education 12: 131–166.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Quale A. (2008) Radical constructivism: A relativist epistemic approach to science education. Sense, Rotterdam.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wampold B. E. (2001) The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah NJ.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wampold B. E., Hollon S. D. & Hill C. E. (2011) Unresolved questions and future directions on psychotherapy research. In: Norcross J. C., VandenBos G. R. & Freedheim D. K. (eds.) History of psychotherapy: Continuity and change. Second edition. American Psychological Association, Washington DC: 333–356.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.
