Volume 8 · Number 1 ·
Pages 5–12
Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann’s Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint
Log in to download the full text for free
Abstract
Problem: Is Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems based on a constructivist or on a realist epistemology? Luhmann’s own elaborations seem to oscillate between both standpoints. Method: The argumentation provided in this article starts with a detailed reconstruction of Luhmann’s epistemology and of Luhmann’s criticism towards radical constructivism and then examines the consequences for a comparison of systems theory and (radical) constructivism. Results: Although Luhmann’s operative constructivism can be distinguished from radical constructivism, the differences are not considered fundamental. Luhmann’s epistemology is clearly nearer to constructivism than to realism and it shares most of constructivism’s key concepts, such as self-referential logic, a strict relation between observer and observed, and the relativism of reality construction. Implications: Luhmann’s criticism of radical constructivism must be understood in the context of his sociological background. Most of his arguments against radical constructivism can be considered apprehensions of misleading interpretations of radical constructivism rather than of substantial criticism. They may help to clarify a radical constructivist epistemology. Constructivist content: The paper attempts to check whether Luhmann’s theory of social theory is based on (radical) constructivist epistemology.
Key words: Systems theory, epistemology, radical constructivism, social systems
Citation
Scholl A. (2012) Between realism and constructivism? Luhmann’s ambivalent epistemological standpoint. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 5–12. http://constructivist.info/8/1/005
Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
Scholl A. (2012) Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann’s Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint
References
Aerts D., Broekaert J. & Gabora L. (2011) A case for applying an abstracted quantum formalism to cognition. New Ideas in Psychology 29(1): 136–146. http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0404068
Ansmann M., Wang H., Bialczak R. C., Hofheinz M., Lucero E., Neeley M., O’Connell A. D., Sank D., Weides M., Wenner J., Cleland A. N. & Martinis J. M. (2009) Violation of Bell’s inequality in Josephson phase qubits. Nature 461: 504–506. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Aspelmeyer M. (2010) Quantum mechanics: The surf is up. Nature 464: 685–686. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Baecker D. (2012) Systemtheorie als Kommunikationstheorie [System theory as communication theory]. In: Jahraus O., Nassehi A., Grizelj M., Saake I., Kirchmeier C. & Müller J. (eds.) Luhmann Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Wirkung [Luhmann Handbook. Life – Work – Impact]. Metzler, Stuttgart: 52–57. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Christis J. (2001) Luhmann’s theory of knowledge: beyond realism and constructivism? Soziale Systeme 7(2): 328–349. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Derrida J. (2010) Voice and phenomenon: Introduction to the problem of the sign in Husserl’s phenomenology. Northwestern University University Press, Evanston IL. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Egner H. (2008) Gesellschaft, Mensch, Umwelt – beobachtet. Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der Geographie [Society, humans, environment – observed. A contribution to the theory of geography]. Franz Steiner, Stuttgart. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Egner H. (2012) Jenseits der Dichotomie von “Sinn” und “Materie.” Ein neues Metaparadigma am Horizont? [Beyond the dichotomy of “meaning” and “matter”. A new meta paradigm on the horizon?] In: Weixlbaumer N. (ed.) Anthologie zur Sozialgeographie [Anthology of social geography]. Institut für Geographie und Regionalforschung, Wien: 35–51. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Esser H. (2002) Wo steht die Soziologie? [Where does sociology stand?] Soziologie 4: 20–32. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gell-Mann M. & Hartle J. B. (2012) Decoherent Histories Quantum Mechanics with One “Real”-Fine-Grained History. Quantum Physics A85: 062120. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gell-Mann M. (1995) The quark and the jaguar. Adventures in the simplex and the complex. Abacus, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1981) The concepts of adaptation and viability in a radical constructivist theory of knowledge. In: Siegel I. E., Brodzinsky D. M. & Golinkoff R. M. (eds.) New directions in Piagetian theory and practice. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 87–95. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/067
Glasersfeld E. von (1984) An introduction to radical constructivism. In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) The invented reality. Norton, New York: 17–40. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/070.1
Glasersfeld E. von (1993) Nicht bekehrt, aber geläutert [Not converted but refined]. Soziologische Revue 16(3): 288–290. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/153
Heider F. (2005) Ding und Medium. Mit einem Vorwort von Dirk Baecker [Object and medium. With a foreword by Dirk Baecker]. Kadmos: Berlin. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1986) Systeme verstehen Systeme [Systems understand systems]. In: Luhmann N. & Schorr K. E. (eds.) Zwischen Intransparenz und Verstehen. Fragen an die Pädagogik [Between nontransparancy and understanding. Questions for pedagogy]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 72–117. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1986) The autopoiesis of social systems. In: Geyer F. & Zouwen J. van der (eds.) Sociocybernetic paradoxes. observation, control and evolution of self-steering systems. Sage, London: 172–192. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1988) Erkenntnis als Konstruktion [Knowledge as construction]. Benteli, Bern. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1988) Selbstreferentielle Systeme [self-referential systems]. In: Simon F. B. (ed.) Lebende Systeme. Wirklichkeitskonstruktionen in der systemischen Therapie [Living systems. Reality constructions in systematic therapy]. Springer, Berlin: 47–53. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1990) Das Erkenntnisprogramm des Konstruktivismus und die unbekannt bleibende Realität [Constructivism’s program of knowledge and the reality that remains unknown]. In: Luhmann N., Soziologische Aufklärung. Band 5. Konstruktivistische Perspektiven [Sociological enlightenment. Volume 5: Constructivist perspectives]. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen: 31–57. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1990) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft [The science of society]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1992) Beobachtungen der Moderne [Observations of the modern age]. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1992) Stellungnahme [Statement]. In: Krawietz W. & Welker M. (eds.) Kritik der Theorie sozialer Systeme [Criticism of the theory of social systems]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 371–386. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1994) Der “Radikale Konstruktivismus” als Theorie der Massenmedien? Bemerkungen zu einer irreführenden Debatte [Radical constructivism as a theory of mass media? Some remarks on a misleading debate]. Communicatio Socialis 27(1): 7–12. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1995) Social Systems. Translated by John Bednarz Jr. with Dirk Baecker. Foreword by Eva M. Knodt. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (2004) Ökologische Kommunikation [Ecological communication]. Fourth edition. Leske + Budrich, Opladen. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. & Poerksen B. (2004) From being to doing. The origins of the biology of cognition. Imprint Academic, Exeter UK. German original published in 2001. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1988) Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. The Irish Journal of Psychology 9(1): 25–82. http://www.enolagaia.com/M88Reality.html
Merten K. (2005) Reaktivität und Reflexivität: Sozialwissenschaftliche Datenerhebung als interferierende Kommunikationsprozesse [Reactivity and reflexivity: Social scientific data collection as interfering communication processes]. In: Wienand E., Westerbarkey J. & Scholl A. (eds.) Kommunikation über Kommunikation. Theorie, Methoden und Praxis [Communication about communication: Theory, methods, and practice]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden: 102–128. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (2008) (Radical) constructivism: What differences does it make? Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 160–162. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/3/3/160.mitterer
Nassehi A. (1992) Wie wirklich sind Systeme? Zum ontologischen und epistemologischen Status von Luhmanns Theorie selbstreferentieller Systeme [How real are systems? On the ontological and epistemological status of Luhmann’s theory of self-referential systems]. In: Krawietz W. & Welker M. (eds.) Kritik der Theorie sozialer Systeme. Auseinandersetzungen mit Luhmanns Hauptwerk [Critique of the theory of social systems. Debating Luhmann’s magnus opum]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main: 43–70. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nassehi A. (2008) Die Zeit der Gesellschaft. Auf dem Weg zu einer soziologischen Theorie der Zeit [The time of society. Towards a sociological theory of time]. Second Edition. VS-Verlag, Wiesbaden. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nassehi A. (2012) Luhmann und Husserl [Luhmann and Husserl]. In: Oliver J., Nassehi A., Grizelj M., Saake I., Kirchmeier C. & Müller J. (eds.) Luhmann Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Wirkung [Luhmann Handbook. Life – Work – Impact]. Metzler, Stuttgart: 13–19. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Proulx J. (2008) Some differences between Maturana and Varela’s theory of cognition and constructivism. Complicity 5(1): 11–26. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schlosshauer M. A. (2007) Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition. Springer, Berlin. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (1987) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus [The discourse of radical constructivism]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (2011) From objects to processes: A proposal to rewrite radical constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 7(1): 1–9. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/7/1/001.schmidt
Scholl A. (2008) Non-dualizing philosophy and empirical research. Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 172–180. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/3/3/172.scholl
Schrödinger E. (1959) Das arithmetische Paradoxon – Die Einheit des Bewusstseins [The arithmetical paradox – The unity of consciousness]. In: Schrödinger E. (ed.) Geist und Materie [Mind and matter]. Vieweg, Braunschweig: 39–51. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Walther P., Resch K. J., Brukner Č. & Zeilinger A. (2006) Experimental entagled entaglement. Physical Review Letters 97: 020501. http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0508183
Zeilinger A. (1996) On the interpretation and philosophical foundation of quantum mechanics. In: Ketvel U. (ed.) Vastakohtien todellisuus. Festschrift for K. V. Laurikainen. University Press Helsinki. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.