Volume 8 · Number 1 · Pages 39–52
Observing Environments

Hugo F. Alrøe & Egon Noe

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: Society is faced with “wicked” problems of environmental sustainability, which are inherently multiperspectival, and there is a need for explicitly constructivist and perspectivist theories to address them. Problem: However, different constructivist theories construe the environment in different ways. The aim of this paper is to clarify the conceptions of environment in constructivist approaches, and thereby to assist the sciences of complex systems and complex environmental problems. Method: We describe the terms used for “the environment” in von Uexküll, Maturana & Varela, and Luhmann, and analyse how their conceptions of environment are connected to differences of perspective and observation. Results: We show the need to distinguish between inside and outside perspectives on the environment, and identify two very different and complementary logics of observation, the logic of distinction and the logic of representation, in the three constructivist theories. Implications: Luhmann’s theory of social systems can be a helpful perspective on the wicked environmental problems of society if we consider carefully the theory’s own blind spots: that it confines itself to systems of communication, and that it is based fully on the conception of observation as indication by means of distinction.

Key words: Umwelt, phenomenology, biosemiotics, autopoiesis, perspectivism, Peirce; environment, observing, Luhmann, Uexküll, Maturana , Varela, observer

Citation

Alrøe H. F. & Noe E. (2012) Observing environments. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 39–52. http://constructivist.info/8/1/039

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Brier S. (2009) Cybersemiotic Pragmaticism and Constructivism
Urrestarazu H. (2014) Social Autopoiesis?
Riegler A. & Scholl A. (2012) Niklas Luhmann and the Sociological Turn in Constructivism
Cadenas H. & Arnold M. (2015) The Autopoiesis of Social Systems and its Criticisms
Mascolo R. (2011) The Bioethical Dimension of Maturana’s Thought

References

Alrøe H. F. & Kristensen E. S. (2002) Towards a systemic research methodology in agriculture: Rethinking the role of values in science. Agriculture and Human Values 19(1): 3–23. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Alrøe H. F. & Kristensen E. S. (2003) Toward a systemic ethic: In search of an ethical basis for sustainability and precaution. Environmental Ethics 25(1): 59–78. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Alrøe H. F. & Noe E. (2008) What makes organic agriculture move – protest, meaning or market? A polyocular approach to the dynamics and governance of organic agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 7(1/2): 5–22. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Alrøe H. F. & Noe E. (2011) The paradox of scientific expertise: A perspectivist approach to knowledge asymmetries. Fachsprache – International Journal of Specialized Communication XXXIV(3–4): 152–167. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Alrøe H. F. (2000) Science as systems learning: Some reflections on the cognitive and communicational aspects of science. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 7(4): 57–78. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Andersen N. Å. (2003) The undecidability of decision. In: Bakken T. & Hernes T. (eds.) Autopoietic organization theory. Copenhagen Business School Press, Oslo: 235–258. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bammer G. & Smithson M. (eds.) (2008) Uncertainty and risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Earthscan Risk in Society Series, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bateson G. (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind. Ballentine Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beer R. (1995) A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence 72(1–2): 173–215. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beus C. E. & Dunlap R. E. (1994) Agricultural paradigms and the practice of agriculture. Rural Sociology 59: 620–635. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brier S. (1999) Biosemiotics and the foundation of cybersemiotics. Semiotica 127(1/4): 169–198. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brier S. (2001) Cybersemiotics and umweltlehre. Semiotica 13: 779–814. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brier S. (2008) Cybersemiotics: Why information is not enough. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brier S. (2009) Cybersemiotic pragmaticism and constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 5(1): 19–38. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/5/1/019.brier
Brooks R. (1986) Achieving artificial intelligence through building robots. MIT AI Lab Memo No. 899. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brooks R. (1991) Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47: 139–159. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brundtland G. H. (1987) Our common future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 42/187. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Buchanan B. (2008) Onto-ethologies. The animal environments of Uexküll, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Deleuze. SUNY Press, Albany. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Capdepuy P., Polani D. & Nehaniv C. (2007) Constructing the basic Umwelt of artificial agents: An information-theoretic approach. In: Almeida e Costa F., Rocha L., Costa E.,  Harvey I. & Coutinho A. (eds.) Advances in artificial life. Proceedings of the 2007 European conference on artificial life. Springer, Berlin: 375–383. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Chien J.-P. (2007) Umwelt, milieu(x) and environment. Semiotica 167(1): 65–89. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cilliers, Paul (2005) Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Theory, Culture & Society 22(5): 255–267. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Clark A. (1997) Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Crosset T. & Beal B. (1997) The use of “subculture” and “subworld” in ethnographic works on sport. Sociology of Sport Journal 14(1): 73–85. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Deely J. (2001) Umwelt. Semiotica 134(1/4): 125–135. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Emmeche C. (2001) Does a robot have an Umwelt? Reflections on the qualitative biosemiotics of Jakob von Uexküll. Semiotica 134(1/4): 653–693. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1981) Observing systems. Intersystems, Seaside CA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (2003) On constructing a reality. In: Understanding understanding. Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York: 211–228. Originally published in 1973. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Franklin S. & Graesser A. (1997) Is it an agent, or just a program? A taxonomy for autonomous agent. In: Müller J., Wooldridge M. & Jennings N. (eds.) Intelligent agents III: Agent theories, architectures and languages. Springer Verlag, Berlin: 21–35. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Froese T. & Ziemke T. (2009) Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind. Artificial Intelligence 173: 466–500. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fuchs P. (2004) Der Sinn der Beobachtung. Velbrück Wissenschaft:Weilerswist. http://www.uboeschenstein.ch/texte/fuchs11.html
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism. A way of knowing and learning. The Falmer Press, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Goodland R. (1995) The concept of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 1–24. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Graumann C. F. (1983) Umwelt. In: Harré R. & Lamb R. (eds.) The encyclopedic dictionary of psychology. Blackwell Reference, Oxford: 647. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Harré R. (1990) Exploring the human Umwelt. In: Bhaskar R. (ed.) Harré and his critics. Basil Blackwell, Oxford: 297–364. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Headland T. N., Pike K. L. & Harris M. (eds.) (1990) Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate. Sage Publications, Newbury Park CA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hellmann K.-U. (1996) Einleitung. In: Luhmann N. (1996) Protest. Systemtheorien und soziale Bewegungen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 7–45. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hoffmeyer J. (1996) Signs of meaning in the universe. Indiana University Press, Bloomington. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Horn J. & Wilburn D. (2005) The embodiment of learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 37(5): 745–760. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kåhre P. (2009) På AI-teknikens axlar: Om kunskapssociologin och stark artificiell intelligens [On the shoulders of AI-technology: Sociology of knowledge and strong artificial intelligence]. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Sociology, Lund University, Sweden. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kåhre P. (2010) Luhmanns massmedieteori och Internet som ett artificiellt intelligent semiotiskt system [Luhmann’s mass-media theory and Internet as an artificial intelligent semiotic system]. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research 26: 81–93. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kant I. (1998) Critique of pure reason. Second edition B. Translated by P. Guyer & A. W. Wood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. German original published in 1787. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Krause D. (2001) Luhmann-Lexikon. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Krause D. (2005) Luhmann-Lexikon. Fourth edition. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kull K. (1999) Biosemiotics in the twentieth century. A view from biology. Semiotica 127(1/4): 385–414. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kull K. (2001) Jakob von Uexküll: An introduction. Semiotica 134(1/4): 1–59. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1973) Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität. Über die Funktion von Zwecken in sozialen Systemen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1982) Autopoiesis, Handlung und Kommunikative Verständigung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 11(4): 366–379. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1986) Ökologische Kommunikation. Kann die moderne Gesellschaft sich auf ökologische Gefährdungen einstellen? Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1989) Ecological communication. Polity Press, Cambridge MA. German original published in 1986. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1990) Essays on self-reference. Columbia University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1992) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1992) Sthenographie. In: Luhmann N., Maturana H., Namiki M., Redder V. & Varela F. J. (eds.) Beobachter. Konvergenz der Erkenntnistheorien? Wilhelm Fink, Munich: 119–138. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford. Originally published in German as: Luhmann N. (1984) Soziale Systeme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, 2 Volumes. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1998) Erkendelse som konstruktion. In: Hermansen M. (ed.) Fra læringens horisont. Forlaget Klim, Århus: 163–184. Originally published in German as: Luhmann N. (1988) Erkenntnis als Konstruktion. Benteli Verlag, Bern. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (2002) Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Edited by Dirk Baecker. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (2006) System as difference. Organization 13(1): 37–57. Edited and translated transcript of a lecture held in 1991. Originally published in German as: Luhmann N. (2004) Einführung in die Systemtheorie, Second edition, edited by Dirk Baecker. Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag, Heidelberg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (2008) Die Moral der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Macinnes I. & Di Paolo E. (2005) From the inside looking out: Self extinguishing perceptual cues and the constructed worlds of animats. In: Capcarrere M., Alves Freitas A., Bentley P., Johnson C. & Timmis J. (eds.) Advances in artificial life. Proceedings of the 2005 European conference on artificial life. Springer, Berlin: 11–20. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. D. Reidel, Dordrecht. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1998) The tree of knowledge. Revised edition. Shambhala, Boston. Originally published in 1987. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1988) Ontology of observing: The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In: Donaldson R. E. (ed.) Texts in cybernetic theory: An in-depth exploration of the thought of Humberto Maturana, William T. Powers, and Ernst von Glasersfeld. American Society for Cybernetics (ASC) conference workbook. http://www.inteco.cl/biology/ontology/index.htm
Maturana H. R. (2004) The origin and conservation of self-consciousness: Reflections on four questions by Heinz von Foerster. Kybernetes 34(1–2): 54–88. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Melhuish C., Ieropoulos I., Greenman J. & Horsfield I. (2006) Energetically autonomous robots: Food for thought. Autonomous Robots 21: 187–198. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Montebelli A., Lowe R. & Ziemke T. (in press) Towards metabolic robotics: Insights from modeling embodied cognition in a bio-mechatronic symbiont. Artificial Life. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Moreno A., Etxeberria A. & Umerez J. (2008) The autonomy of biological individuals and artificial models. BioSystems 91(2): 309–319. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nirenburg S. & Raskin V. (1987) The subworld concept lexicon and the lexicon management system. Computational Linguistics 13(3–4): 276–289. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noe E. & Alrøe H. F. (2003) Farm enterprises as self-organizing systems: A new transdisciplinary framework for studying farm enterprises? International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 11(1): 3–14. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noe E. & Alrøe H. F. (2006) Combining Luhmann and Actor-Network Theory to see farm enterprises as self-organizing systems. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 13(1): 34–48. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noe E. & Alrøe H. F. (2012) Observing farming systems: Insights from social systems theory. In: Darnhofer I., Gibbon D. & Dedieu B. (eds.). Farming systems research into the 21st century: The new dynamic. Springer, Dordrecht: 387–403. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noe E., Alrøe H. F. & Langvad A. M. S. (2008) A polyocular framework for research on multifunctional farming and rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 48(1): 1–15. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Norton B. G. (2012) The ways of wickedness. Analyzing messiness with messy tools. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25: 447–465. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nöth W. (1997) Representation in semiotics and in computer science. Semiotica 115(3/4): 203–213. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nöth W. (2011) Some neglected semiotic premises of some radically constructivist conclusions. Constructivist Foundations 7(2): 12–14. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/7/2/011.noeth
Palmquist S. (1993) Kant’s system of perspectives: An architectonic interpretation of the critical philosophy. University Press of America, Lanham MD. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Paull J. (2006) The farm as organism: The foundational idea of organic agriculture. Elementals: Journal of Bio-Dynamics Tasmania 83: 14–18. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Peirce C. S. (1994) CP: The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Electronic edition reproducing Past Masters. Hartshorne C. & Weiss P. (eds.) (1931–1935) Volumes I–VI. Harvard University Press, Cambridge; Burks A. (ed.) (1958) Volumes VII–VIII. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Intelex Corporation, Charlottesville. All quotes referring to Peirce’s collected papers are abbreviated as “CP volume.pagenumber.” ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Prem E. (1997) Epistemic autonomy in models of living systems. In: Proceedings of the fourth European conference on artificial life. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 2–9. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ransdell J. (1997) Is Peirce a phenomenologist? The Peirce Group’s Arisbe, Institute for American Thought. Retrieved from http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/aboutcsp/ransdell/phenom.htm on 25 September 2012. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ransdell J. (2007) On the use and abuse of the immediate/dynamical object distinction. The Peirce Group’s Arisbe, Institute for American Thought. Retrieved from http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/aboutcsp/ransdell/useabuse.htm on 25 September 2012. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rittel H. W. J. & Webber M. M. (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences 4: 155–169. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. (2010) Radical constructivism: A tool, not a super theory! Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 6–11. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/6/1/006.schmidt
Sebeok T. (2001) Biosemiotics: Its roots, proliferation and prospects. Semiotica 134(1/4): 61–78. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sorokin P. (1975) Hunger as factor in human affairs. University of Florida Press, Gainesville. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Spencer-Brown G. (2009) Laws of form. Fifth edition. Bohmeier Verlag, Leipzig. Originally published in 1969. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stjernfelt F. (2011) Simple animals and complex biology: Uexküll’s twofold influence on Cassirer’s philosophy. Synthese 179: 169–186. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sutrop U. (2001) Umwelt – word and concept. Two hundred years of semantic change. Semiotica 134(1/4): 447–462. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sørensen M. & Ziemke T. (2007) Agents without agency? Cognitive Semiotics 0: 102–124. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Uexküll J. von (1957) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men – a picture book of invisible worlds. In: Schiller C. (ed.) Instinctive behaviour – The development of a modern concept. International Universities Press, New York: 319–391. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Uexküll J. von (1973) Theoretische Biologie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. Reprint of second edition from 1928. English translation of the first edition: Uexküll J. von (1926) Theoretical biology. Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Uexküll J. von (1982) The theory of meaning. Semiotica 42(1): 25–82. Originally published in German as: Uexküll J. von (1940) Bedeutungslehre. J. A. Barth, Leipzig. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Uexküll J. von (1992) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. A picture book of invisible worlds. Semiotica 89(4): 319–391. Reprint from Schiller C. H. (ed.) (1957) Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept. International Universities Press, New York: 5–82. Originally published in German as: Uexküll J. von & Kriszat O. (1934) Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. Springer, Berlin. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Uexküll T. von (1992) Introduction – the sign theory of Jakob von Uexküll. Semiotica 89(4): 279–316. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1979) Principles of biological autonomy. Elsevier, Amsterdam. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1991) Organism: A meshwork of selfless selves. In: Tauber A. I. (ed.) Organism and the origins of self. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 79–107. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1997) Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition 34: 72–87. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J., Maturana H. & Uribe R. (1974) Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. BioSystems 5: 187–196. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ziemke T. & Lowe R. (2009) On the role of emotion in embodied cognitive architectures: From organisms to robots. Cognitive Computation 1(1): 104–117. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ziemke T. & Sharkey N. E. (2001) A stroll through the worlds of robots and animals. Applying Jakob von Uexküll’s theory of meaning to adaptive robots and artificial life. Semiotica 134(1/4): 701–746. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ziemke T. (2001) The construction of “reality” in the robot. Foundations of Science 6(1): 163–233. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ziemke T. (2007) The embodied self – Theories, hunches and robot models. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14(7): 167–179. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ziemke T. (2007) What’s life got to do with it? In: Chella A. & Manzotti R. (eds.) Artificial consciousness. Imprint Academic, Exeter. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ziemke T. (2008) On the role of emotion in biological and robotic autonomy. BioSystems 91: 401–408. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ziemke T., Zlatev J. & Frank R. (eds.) (2007) Body, language and mind. Volume 1: Embodiment. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.