Volume 8 · Number 1 · Pages 103-110
Communication Emerging? On Simulating Structural Coupling in Multiple Contingency

Manfred Füllsack

Download the full text in
PDF (560 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Problem: Can communication emerge from the interaction of “self-referentially closed systems,” conceived as operating solely on the base of the “internal” output of their onboard means? Or in terms of philosophical conceptions: can communication emerge without (“outward” directed) “intention” or “will to be understood”? Method: Multi-agent simulation based on a conceptual analysis of the theory of social systems as suggested by Niklas Luhmann. Results: Agents that co-evolutionarily aggregate probabilities on how to cope with their environment can structurally couple and generate a form of “eigenbehavior” that retrospectively (i.e., by an observer) might be interpreted as communication. Implications: The “intention” or the “will to be understood,” as prominently claimed to be indispensable in communication by theoreticians such as Jürgen Habermas, can be seen as a retrospective ascription to an emergent property of complex interaction. Constructivist content: The paper attempts to base constructivist reasoning on data generated in simulations.

Key words: Communication, information, contingency, structural coupling, intentionality, observer dependency, multi-agent simulation.

Citation

Füllsack M. (2012) Communication emerging? On simulating structural coupling in multiple contingency. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 103-110. http://constructivist.info/8/1/103

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Füllsack M. (2014) The Circular Conditions of Second-order Science Sporadically Illustrated with Agent-based Experiments at the Roots of Observation
Füllsack M. (2018) Plasticity, Granularity and Multiple Contingency - Essentials for Conceiving an Artificial Constructivist Agent
Hejl P. M. (2011) The Individual in Radical Constructivism. Some Critical Remarks from an Evolutionary Perspective
Leydesdorff L. (2012) Radical Constructivism and Radical Constructedness: Luhmann’s Sociology of Semantics, Organizations, and Self-Organization
Bettoni M. C. (2007) The Yerkish Language: From Operational Methodology to Chimpanzee Communication

References

Arthur W. B. (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal 99: 116–131. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barber M., Blanchard P., Buchinger E., Cessac B. & Streit L. (2006) Expectation-driven interaction. A model based on Luhmann’s contingency approach. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9(4) http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/4/5.html
Borensztajn G. & Trehan V. (2006) Luc Steels, the talking heads experiment and cognitive philosophy. http://staff.science.uva.nl/~gideon/Steels_Tutorial_PART1.pdf
Clayton P. & Davies P. (eds.) (2006) The re-emergence of emergence: The emergentist hypothesis from science to religion. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Crutchfield J. P. (1994) The calculi of emergence: Computation, dynamics, and induction. Physica D 75: 11–54. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fiorillo C. D. (2012) Beyond bayes: On the need for a unified and Jaynesian definition of probability and information within neuroscience. Information 3(2): 175–203. http://www.mdpi.com/2078–2489/3/2/175/pdf
Fleischmann A. (2005) A model for a simple Luhmann economy. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 8(2) http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/2/4.html
Foerster H. von (1976) Objects: Tokens for (eigen-)behaviors. ASC Cybernetics Forum 8(3–4): 91–96. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York: 261–271. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Füllsack M. (2009) Antizipation und ihre Formalisierung. Zur Simulation sozialer Systeme nach Loet Leydesdorff. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 34(3): 62–81. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Füllsack M. (2010) Die Arbitrarität der Zeichen, oder: Was widerspiegelt ein Glider? Simulationen und die Unterscheidung von beobachtetem und Eigen-Verhalten komplexer Systeme. In: Füllsack M. (ed.) Simulation komplexer Systeme. Forschen in der Von-Neumann-Galaxie. Institut für Wissenschaft und Kunst, Vienna: 47–54. http://homepage.univie.ac.at/manfred.fuellsack/salience.pdf
Füllsack M. (2011) Firstness – As seen from the perspective of complexity research. E-Logos. Journal for Philosophy 8: 2–19. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Füllsack M. (2011) Gleichzeitige Ungleichzeitigkeiten. Eine Einführung in die Komplexitätsforschung. VS-Verlag, Wiesbaden. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Füllsack M. (2012) Information, meaning and eigenforms. In the light of sociology, agent-based modeling and AI. Information 3(3): 331–343. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Habermas J. (1984–1987) The theory of communicative action. 2 Volumes. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Polity Press, Cambridge MA. German original “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns” published in 1981. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kim J. (1993) Supervenience and mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kron T. & Dittrich P. (2002) Doppelte Kontingenz nach Luhmann – Ein Simulationsexperiment. In: Kron T. (ed.) Luhmann modelliert. Ansätze zur Simulation von Kommunikationssystemen. Leske + Budrich, Opladen: 209–251. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kron T. (2005) Der komplizierte Akteur. Lit, Münster. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kron T. (ed.) (2002) Luhmann modelliert. Sozionische Ansätze zur Simulation von Kommunikationssystemen. Leske and Budrich, Opladen. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kron T., Lasarczyk C. & Schimank U. (2003) Doppelte Kontingenz und die Bedeutung von Netzwerken für Kommunikationssysteme. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 5: 374–395. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lewis D. (1969) Convention: A philosophical study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Leydesdorff L. (1993) “Structure”/“action” contingencies and the model of parallel Processing. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 23(1): 47–77. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Leydesdorff L. (2002) The communication turn in the theory of social systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 19(2): 129–136. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Leydesdorff L. (2008) The communication of meaning in anticipatory systems: A simulation study of the dynamics of intentionality in social interactions. In: Dubois D. M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing Anticipatory Systems CASYS’07. American Institute of Physics, Melville NY: 33–49. http://www.leydesdorff.net/casys07/casys07.pdf
Leydesdorff L. (2012) Radical constructivism and radical constructedness: Luhmann’s sociology of semantics, organizations, and self-organization. Constructvist Foundations 8(1): 85–92. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/8/1/085.leydesdorff
Lorenz E. N. (1969) Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 26(4): 636–646. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1977) Interpenetration – Zum Verhältnis personaler und sozialer Systeme. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 6(1): 62–76. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1978) Interpenetration bei Parsons. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 7(3): 299–302. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1990) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1995) Social systems. Translated by J. Bednarz Jr & D. Baecker. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA. German original published as: Luhmann N. (1984) Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (2001) Aufsätze und Reden. Reclam, Stuttgart. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (2002) How can the mind participate in communication? In: Rasch W. (ed.) Theories of distinction: Redescribing the descriptions of modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA: 169–184. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
MacKay D. M. (1969) Information. Mechanism and meaning. MIT Press: Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Reidel, Boston. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1987) The tree on knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Parsons T. & Shils E. A. (eds.) (1951) Toward a general theory of action. Harper and Row, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Parsons T. (1952) Superego and the theory of social systems. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Social Relations 15: 15–25. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Parsons T. (1964) Social structure and personality. Free Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Parsons T. (1968) Interaction: I. Social interaction. In: Sills D. L. (ed.) The international encyclopedia of the social sciences, Volume 7. McGraw-Hill, New York: 429–441. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Russell A. R. (2000) Odour detection by mobile robots. World Scientific Publishing, River Edge NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schimank U. (1988) Gesellschaftliche Teilsysteme als Akteurfiktionen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 4: 619–639. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Searle J. R. (1980) Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 417–424. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Shannon C. (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423, 623–656. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Spencer-Brown G. (1969) Laws of form. Allen & Unwin, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Steels L. (1995) A self-organizing spatial vocabulary. Artificial Life 2(3): 319–332. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Steels L. (1999) The talking heads experiment. Words and meanings. VUB Press, Brussels. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vanderstraeten R. (2000) Autopoiesis and socialization: On Luhmann’s reconceptualization of communication and socialization. British Journal of Sociology 51(3): 581–598. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1992) Autopoiesis and a biology of intentionality. In: McMullin B. (ed.) Proceedings of the Workshop “Autopoiesis and Perception,” Dublin City University: 4–14. http://elm.eeng.dcu.ie/~alife/bmcm9401/varela.pdf
Wolfram S. (2002) A new kind of science. Wolfram-Science, Champaign IL. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.