Volume 9 · Number 1 · Pages 1–6
Computation, Cognition and Constructivism: Introduction to the Special Issue

Alexander Riegler, John Stewart & Tom Ziemke

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Context: Most constructivist discourse is situated at the philosophical-conceptual level, where arguments appeal to the intuition of the reader, while formal-computational models have only been taken into account to a very limited degree so far. Problem: Two types of problems need to be addressed: Synthetically, can constructivist concepts be turned into actual computational implementations? Can these be further conceptual developments in constructivist theory as such, or are they just an application thereof? Conceptually, does the notion of computation square with constructivist approaches at all? Method: Paradigmatically, we discuss the meaning of “computational” in cognitive agents that comply with constructivist concepts. Also, we summarize the contributions. Results: From a constructivist point of view, the concept of “computational model” is ambiguous and depends on whether it is used in the sense of the computational(ist) theory of mind or simply as a tool. Implications: The insights presented in the contributions to this special issue point in the direction of a computational extension of constructivist approaches as well as a constructivist extension to computational approaches. However, while many of the questions we posed were discussed in the contributions and open peer commentaries, some of them were largely neglected and thus are subject to further discussion.

Key words: Artificial intelligence, artificial life, cognitive sciences, computation, computational theory of mind, constructivism, models


Riegler A., Stewart J. & Ziemke T. (2013) Computation, cognition and constructivism: Introduction to the special issue. Constructivist Foundations 9(1): 1–6. http://constructivist.info/9/1/001

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Füllsack M. (2013) Constructivism and Computation: Can Computer-Based Modeling Add to the Case for Constructivism?
Müller K. H. & Riegler A. (2014) A New Course of Action
Riegler A. & Weber S. (2013) Non-dualism: A New Understanding of Language
Glanville R. & Riegler A. (2007) Editorial: Ninety Years of Constructing
Riegler A. & Gash H. (2011) Legacy of a Great Thinker. Editorial for the Commemorative Issue for Ernst von Glasersfeld


Darden, L. (1997) Recent work in computational scientific discovery. In: Shafto M. G. & Langley P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 161–166. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dennett D. C. (1996) Kinds of minds: Toward an understanding of consciousness. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Drescher G. (1991) Made-up minds: A constructivist approach to artificial intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology. In: Smock C. D. & Glasersfeld E. von (eds.) Epistemology and education. Follow Through Publications, Athens GA: 1–24. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/034
Glasersfeld E. von (1990) An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. In: Davis R. B., Maher C. A. & Noddings N. (eds.) Monographs of the Journal for Research in Mathematics Education #4. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston VA: 19–29. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/127
Goody J. R. (1977) The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Grier D. A. (2006) When computers were human. Princeton University Press, Princeton. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Humphreys P. (1991) Computer simulation. In: Fine A., Forbes M. & Wessels L. (eds.) PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Philosophy of Science Association Biennial Meetings. Volume 2. The Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing MI: 497–506. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McMullin B. & Varela F. J. (1997) Rediscovering computational autopoiesis. In: Husbands P. & Harvey I. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 38–47. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mossio M., Longo G. & Stewart J. (2009) An expression of closure to efficient causation in terms of lambda-calculus. Journal of Theoretical Biology 257(3): 489–498. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pfeifer R. & Scheier C. (1999) Understanding intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Piaget J. (1954) The construction of reality in the child. Ballantine: New York. French original published as: Piaget J. (1937) La construction du réel chez l’enfant. Neuchâtel: Délachaux & Niestlé. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Porr B., Egerton A. & Wörgötter F. (2006) Towards closed loop information: predictive information. Constructivist Foundations 1(2): 83–90. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/2/083.porr
Riegler A., Peschl M. & Stein A. von (eds.) (1999) Understanding representation in the cognitive sciences. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/pub/representation/
Rosen R. (1991) Life itself: A comprehensive enquiry into the nature, origin and fabrication of life. Columbia University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stewart J., Gapenne O. & Di Paolo E. (eds.) (2010) Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stiegler B. (1998) Technics and time. Volume 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stojanov G. (2009) History of usage of Piaget’s theory of cognitive development in AI and robotics: A look backwards for a step forwards. In: Cañamero L., Oudeyer P.-Y. & Balkenius C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics. LUCS, Lund: 243–245. http://www.lucs.lu.se/LUCS/146/
Thagard P. (1988) Computational philosophy of science. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J., Maturana H. R. & Uribe R. (1974) Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. BioSystems 5: 187–196. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vernon D. (2010) Enaction as a conceptual framework for developmental cognitive robotics. Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics 1(2): 89–98. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ziemke T. (2001) The construction of “reality” in the robot: Constructivist perspectives on situated AI and adaptive robotics. Foundations of Science 6(1): 163–233. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/pub/science/
Ziemke T. (2012) The construction of embodied agency: The other side of the system–environment coin. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 52–54. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/8/1/052.ziemke

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.