Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Ethics: A Radical-constructivist Approach” by Andreas Quale. Upshot: The sharp distinction between cognitive and non-cognitive knowledge provided by Andreas Quale prevents the author from finding well-founded reasons for constructivist ethics.
Scholl A. (2014) When sharp distinctions fail to be useful. Constructivist Foundations 9(2): 273–274. http://constructivist.info/9/2/273
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.