Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Ethics: A Radical-constructivist Approach” by Andreas Quale. Upshot: I agree with Quale’s argument for the ethical neutrality of constructivism. However, I want to point out that radical constructivism does not proclaim itself to be ethically neutral. Additionally, I want to criticize the somewhat ambivalent use of the term “personal responsibility” and argue that constructivists need to rethink and ultimately drop the claim of responsibility following from constructivism.
Danelzik M. (2014) Constructivists should drop the claim of ethical responsibility. Constructivist Foundations 9(2): 274–275. http://constructivist.info/9/2/274
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.