Moving on with constructivism (2000)
Alexander Riegler
Karl Jaspers Forum: An electronic journal for target articles TA24 C15
In this commentary I want to stress two issues: My appreciation for the overview of MIR-related theories (it can be considered a challenging first step toward an even more comprehensive overview) and the need to move on with constructivist issues. I am writing from a pragmatic perspective. The sophisticated formulation of radical constructivism (RC) seems to be the result of a long historical line of argumentation. Now the interesting questions arise: how can we use it? Will it provide insights and mechanisms which can actually be used to alter the way we approach (everyday and scientific) problems?
@article{Riegler12,
author = {Riegler A.},
title = {Moving on with constructivism},
year = {2000},
URL = {https://constructivist.info/riegler/12},
journal = {Karl Jaspers Forum: An electronic journal for target articles TA24 C15},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {--}
}
%0 Journal Article
%A Riegler A.
%T Moving on with constructivism
%D 2000
%U https://constructivist.info/riegler/12
%J Karl Jaspers Forum: An electronic journal for target articles TA24 C15
%P -
%V
%N
%X In this commentary I want to stress two issues: My appreciation for the overview of MIR-related theories (it can be considered a challenging first step toward an even more comprehensive overview) and the need to move on with constructivist issues. I am writing from a pragmatic perspective. The sophisticated formulation of radical constructivism (RC) seems to be the result of a long historical line of argumentation. Now the interesting questions arise: how can we use it? Will it provide insights and mechanisms which can actually be used to alter the way we approach (everyday and scientific) problems?
%2 constructivism
PT - JOUR
A1 - Riegler A.
T1 - Moving on with constructivism
Y1 - 2000
UR - https://constructivist.info/riegler/12
AB - In this commentary I want to stress two issues: My appreciation for the overview of MIR-related theories (it can be considered a challenging first step toward an even more comprehensive overview) and the need to move on with constructivist issues. I am writing from a pragmatic perspective. The sophisticated formulation of radical constructivism (RC) seems to be the result of a long historical line of argumentation. Now the interesting questions arise: how can we use it? Will it provide insights and mechanisms which can actually be used to alter the way we approach (everyday and scientific) problems?
JF - Karl Jaspers Forum: An electronic journal for target articles TA24 C15
SP -
EP -
VL -
IS -
ER -
Riegler A. (2000) Moving on with constructivism. Karl Jaspers Forum: An electronic journal for target articles TA24 C15. Available at https://constructivist.info/riegler/12