Exploring the Diversity within Enactivism and Neurophenomenology (2016)
Edited by Tom Froese, Sebastjan Vörös & Alexander Riegler
Constructivist Foundations 11(2)
The theoretical and pragmatic presuppositions of recent enactive and neuro-phenomenological cognitive science have been greatly influenced by three intellectual traditions: philosophy of mind (analytic tradition), phenomenology, and radical constructivism. All of these traditions have made important, often mutually enriching, yet sometimes also mutually incompatible contributions. To make these differences more explicit and to potentially address and overcome them, the contributions in the special issue discuss two closely related topics: What is the nature and structure of the subject-world relation? What is the nature and structure of experience?
@book{Riegler86,
editor = {Froese T., Vörös S. & Riegler A.},
title = {Exploring the Diversity within Enactivism and Neurophenomenology},
year = {2016},
URL = {https://constructivist.info/riegler/86},
publisher = {}
address = {}
}
%0 Edited Book
%A Froese T
%A Vörös S.
%A Riegler A.
%T Exploring the Diversity within Enactivism and Neurophenomenology
%D 2016
%U https://constructivist.info/riegler/86
%X The theoretical and pragmatic presuppositions of recent enactive and neuro-phenomenological cognitive science have been greatly influenced by three intellectual traditions: philosophy of mind (analytic tradition), phenomenology, and radical constructivism. All of these traditions have made important, often mutually enriching, yet sometimes also mutually incompatible contributions. To make these differences more explicit and to potentially address and overcome them, the contributions in the special issue discuss two closely related topics: What is the nature and structure of the subject-world relation? What is the nature and structure of experience?
%2 constructivism
%2 epistemology
PT - BOOK
A1 - Froese T., Vörös S. & Riegler A.
T1 - Exploring the Diversity within Enactivism and Neurophenomenology
Y1 - 2016
UR - https://constructivist.info/riegler/86
AB - The theoretical and pragmatic presuppositions of recent enactive and neuro-phenomenological cognitive science have been greatly influenced by three intellectual traditions: philosophy of mind (analytic tradition), phenomenology, and radical constructivism. All of these traditions have made important, often mutually enriching, yet sometimes also mutually incompatible contributions. To make these differences more explicit and to potentially address and overcome them, the contributions in the special issue discuss two closely related topics: What is the nature and structure of the subject-world relation? What is the nature and structure of experience?
ER -
Froese T., Vörös S. & Riegler A. (2016) Exploring the Diversity within Enactivism and Neurophenomenology. Constructivist Foundations 11(2). Available at https://constructivist.info/riegler/86